Mrs N Dragomir v Pearce Recruitment Ltd T/a Accept Recruitment: 2601434/2022
JUDGMENT
The complaint that the claimant was unfairly dismissed is struck out.REASONS
[2]Section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires a claimant to have not less than two years service to make an unfair dismissal complaint.[3]The claimant was employed by the respondent for less than two years.[4]Therefore the claimant is not entitled to bring such a complaint.[5]The claimant has failed to give an acceptable reason, despite being given the opportunity to do so, why the complaint should not be struck out.[6]Accordingly, the complaint of unfair dismissal is struck out. The claimant’s other complaints are not affected by this judgment. _____________________________ Employment Judge Ahmed Date: 8 July 2022[1]The claim was issued in the Midlands East Employment Tribunals on 28 June 2022. The respondent has failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge has decided that a determination can properly be made of the claim, or part of it, in accordance with rule 21 of the Rules of Procedure.[2]The respondent has made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and must pay the claimant £640.00 gross.[3]The respondent must pay the claimant £640 in total.[4]The hearing listed on 7 October 2022 is cancelled. _____________________________ Employment Judge Hutchinson Date: 17 August 2022 CASE NO: 2601434/2022 1 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mrs Nicoleta Dragomir Respondents: Pearce Recruitment Limited T/A Accept Recruitment Record of a Preliminary Hearing heard by CVP at the Employment Tribunal Heard at: Nottingham On: 8 December 2022 Before: Employment Judge Hutchinson (sitting alone) Representation Claimant: Demetria Ion Respondent: Roy Magara, Solicitor[1]The name of the Respondent is amended to Pearce Recruitment Limited T/A Accept Recruitment. The Judgment dated 17 August 2022 is revoked. The response has been accepted.[4]Case Management Directions are enclosed. CASE NO: 2601434/2022 2