Mrs S Wilkins and Mr G Wilkins v Mr J Miall T/a Ocean Fresh: 2601308/2022 and 2601309/2022

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Case No 2601308/2022, 2601309/2022
Mrs S Wilkins and Mr G WilkinsClaimantMr J Miall T/a Ocean FreshRespondent
Employment Judge FredericksMs A Doble (instructed by Counsel) for claimantIn person for respondentDate 20 October 2022

JUDGMENT

[1]By consent, the first claimant’s claim for redundancy payment following her redundancy succeeds and the respondent is ordered to pay her £3,706.56, made up of -a. 12 years x 1.5 x £142.56 = £2,566.08; andb. 8 years x 1 x £142.56 = £1,140.48.[2]In breach of contract, the first claimant did not receive 12 weeks’ notice before the termination of her employment and was not paid in lieu of notice, and so it is ordered that the respondent pays her 12 weeks x £142.56 = £1,170.72.[3]The first claimant lost statutory rights as a result of her dismissal and the respondent is ordered to pay her £500.[4]By consent, the first claimant is owed £213.84 in accrued but untaken holiday pay and it is ordered that the respondent pay her that sum. Case Number: 2601308/2022 & 2601309/2022 2 of 2[5]The respondent failed to provide the first claimant with a written statement of particulars of employment and it is considered just and equitable to award the higher amount of 4 weeks’ pay in compensation, that being £570.24.[6]Consequently, the total amount which the respondent is ordered to pay the first claimant is £6,701.36. The second claimant (Mr G Wilkins)[7]By consent, the second claimant’s claim for redundancy payment following his redundancy succeeds and the respondent is ordered to pay him £334.40, calculated as 5 years x 0.5 x £133.76.[8]In breach of contract, the second claimant did not receive 5 weeks’ notice before the termination of his employment and was not paid in lieu of notice, and so it is ordered that the respondent pays him 5 weeks x £133.76 = £668.60.[9]The second claimant lost statutory rights as a result of his dismissal and the respondent is ordered to pay him £500.[10]By consent, the second claimant is owed £401.28 in accrued but untaken holiday pay and it is ordered that the respondent pay him that sum.[11]The respondent failed to provide the second claimant with a written statement of particulars of employment and it is considered just and equitable to award the higher amount of 4 weeks’ pay in compensation, that being £535.04.[12]Consequently, the total amount which the respondent is ordered to pay the second claimant is £2,372.64. Signed: Employment Judge Fredericks 20 October 2022 Sent to the parties on: 04 November 2022. For the tribunal office: Note: Full reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing. Written reasons will not be provided unless requested in writing within 14 days of the sending of this judgment. Case Number: 2601308/2022 & 2601309/2022 1 of 2 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimants Respondent(1) Mrs S Wilkins(2) Mr G Wilkins v Mr J Miall t/a Ocean Fresh Heard at: Nottingham (via CVP) On: 20 October 2022 Before: Employment Judge Fredericks Appearances For the claimants: Ms A Doble (Counsel) For the respondent: In person[1]By consent, the first claimant’s claim for redundancy payment following her redundancy succeeds and the respondent is ordered to pay her £3,706.56, made up of -a. 12 years x 1.5 x £142.56 = £2,566.08; andb. 8 years x 1 x £142.56 = £1,140.48.[2]In breach of contract, the first claimant did not receive 12 weeks’ notice before the termination of her employment and was not paid in lieu of notice, and so it is ordered that the respondent pays her 12 weeks x £142.56 = £1,710.72.[3]The first claimant lost statutory rights as a result of her dismissal and the respondent is ordered to pay her £500. Case Number: 2601308/2022 & 2601309/2022 2 of 2[4]By consent, the first claimant is owed £213.84 in accrued but untaken holiday pay and it is ordered that the respondent pay her that sum.[5]The respondent failed to provide the first claimant with a written statement of particulars of employment and it is considered just and equitable to award the higher amount of 4 weeks’ pay in compensation, that being £570.24.[6]Consequently, the total amount which the respondent is ordered to pay the first claimant is £6,701.36. The second claimant (Mr G Wilkins)[7]By consent, the second claimant’s claim for redundancy payment following his redundancy succeeds and the respondent is ordered to pay him £334.40, calculated as 5 years x 0.5 x £133.76.[8]In breach of contract, the second claimant did not receive 5 weeks’ notice before the termination of his employment and was not paid in lieu of notice, and so it is ordered that the respondent pays him 5 weeks x £133.76 = £668.60.[9]The second claimant lost statutory rights as a result of his dismissal and the respondent is ordered to pay him £500.[10]By consent, the second claimant is owed £334.40 in accrued but untaken holiday pay and it is ordered that the respondent pay him that sum.[11]The respondent failed to provide the second claimant with a written statement of particulars of employment and it is considered just and equitable to award the higher amount of 4 weeks’ pay in compensation, that being £535.04.[12]Consequently, the total amount which the respondent is ordered to pay the second claimant is £2,372.44.