Mr B Walker v C Hocknell T/a Gizmos & Gadgets (FoneDoctor): 2601217/2022

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Case No 2601217/2022
Mr B WalkerClaimantColin Hocknell T/as Gizmos & Gadgets (FoneDoctor)Respondent
Employment Judge AyreDate 28 October 2022

JUDGMENT

The complaint that the claimant was unfairly dismissed is struck out.

REASONS

[2]Section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires a claimant to have not less than two years service to make an unfair dismissal complaint.[3]The claimant was employed by the respondent for less than two years.[4]Therefore the claimant is not entitled to bring such a complaint.[5]The claimant has failed to give an acceptable reason, despite being given the opportunity to do so, why the complaint should not be struck out.[6]Accordingly, the complaint of unfair dismissal is struck out. The claimant’s other complaints are not affected by this judgment. _____________________________ Employment Judge Ayre Date: 13 June 2022[1]By a letter dated 11 October 2022 the Tribunal gave the respondent an opportunity to make representations or to request a hearing, as to why the claim or response should not be struck out because: the manner in which the proceedings have been conducted has been unreasonable; and/or it has not been actively pursued.[2]The claimant has failed to make representations in writing, or has failed to make any sufficient representations, why this should not be done or to request a hearing. The response is therefore struck out.[3]The hearing fixed for 19-21 February 2024 will not take place. Employment Judge Adkinson Date: 28 October 2022 Case Number: 2601217/2022 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr B Walker Respondent: Colin Hocknell T/as Gizmos & Gadgets[1]By a letter dated 11 October 2022 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or to request a hearing, as to why the claim or response should not be struck out because: the manner in which the proceedings have been conducted has been unreasonable; and/or it has not been actively pursued.[2]The claimant has failed to make representations in writing, or has failed to make any sufficient representations, why this should not be done or to request a hearing. The claim is therefore struck out.[3]The hearing fixed for 19-21 February 2024 will not take place.