Mr I Idemudia v Quack Recruitment Ltd part of Quack Group: 2601165/2022
JUDGMENT
Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21[1]The claim was issued in the [Midlands East] Employment Tribunals on [10.5.2022]. The respondent has failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge has decided that a determination can properly be made of the claim, or part of it, in accordance with rule 21 of the Rules of Procedure.[2]The respondent has failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and must pay the claimant £532.64.[3]The hearing listed on 2.9.2022 is cancelled.