Miss E Hughes v Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust: 2601070/2024

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS

Case No 2601070/2024

Between

Miss E. HughesClaimant

Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation TrustRespondent

Before

Employment Judge Broughton with Non-Legal Members Ms Dean and Mr

Miss Harrison - counsel for claimant

Mr Perry - counsel for respondent

Date 18 May 2026

[1]The claimant’s claim of unfair dismissal pursuant to section 94 ERA is well founded and succeeds but is subject to a Polkey deduction of 75%.

[2]The complaints under section 15 and 20/21 Equality Act 2010 are not well founded and are dismissed.

[3]The judgment on remedy is reserved pending further written submissions. Employment Judge Broughton Date:18 May 2026 06.06.2026 Hrishiraj Pramanik …………………………. 1 of 2 Case Number: 2601070/2024 "Recordings and Transcription Please note that if a Tribunal hearing has been recorded you may request a transcript of the recording, for which a charge may be payable. If a transcript is produced it will not include any oral judgment or reasons given at the hearing. The transcript will not be checked, approved or verified by a judge. There is more information in the joint Presidential Practice Direction on the Recording and Transcription of Hearings, and accompanying Guidance, which can be found here: https://www.judiciary.uk/guidance-and-resources/employment-rules-and-legislation-practice- directions/" Note Reasons for the judgment having been given in summary orally at the hearing, written reasons (summary or full) will not be provided unless a request was made by either party at the hearing or a written request is presented by either party within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision. Public access to employment tribunal decisions Judgments and reasons for the judgments are published, in full, online at www.gov.uk/employment- tribunal-decisions shortly after a copy has been sent to the claimant(s) and respondent(s) in a case. 2 of 2