Mr C A Whitworth v Aurora Knight Ltd and S H Ejaz: 2600746/2022 Mr C A Whitworth v Aurora Knight Ltd and S H Ejaz: 2600746/2022

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Case No 2600746/2022
Mr C A WhitworthClaimant1. Aurora Knight Limited 2. Syed Hassan EjazRespondent
Employment Judge AdkinsonDate 11 May 2022

JUDGMENT

Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21[1]The claim was issued in the [Midlands East] Employment Tribunals on [11 March 2022]. The respondent has failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge has decided that a determination can properly be made of the claim, or part of it, in accordance with rule 21 of the Rules of Procedure.[2]The respondent has made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and must pay the claimant £1650 gross.[3]All future hearings are cancelled. Employment Judge Adkinson Date: 11 May 2022 Case Number: 2600746/2022 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr C A Whitworth Respondent: 1. Aurora Knight Limited 2. Syed Hassan Ejaz

REASONS

[1]The claimant complains of unfair dismissal.[2]Section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires a claimant to have not less than two years’ service to make an unfair dismissal complaint.[3]The claimant was employed by the respondent for less than two years.[4]Therefore, the claimant is not entitled to bring such a complaint.[5]The claimant has failed to give an acceptable reason, despite being given the opportunity to do so, why the complaint should not be struck out.[6]Accordingly, the complaint of unfair dismissal is struck out. The claimant’s other complaints are not affected by this judgment.