Mr T Bandy v Ankhsystems: 2600496/2017
JUDGMENT
The proceedings are dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. _____________________________ Employment Judge Milgate 15.5.18 _____________________________ JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON .......16/05/2018.......................................................... ....................... FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE Case No:2600496/2017 4.17 Rule 21 judgment – universal template. September 2017 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr T Bandy Respondents: Un.titled: first Respondent Marshall Design/Marshall Design Consultants Ltd (in voluntary liquidation): Second Respondent Ankhystems Ltd: third Respondent Marshall Hosting & Website Services Ltd: fourth Respondent Willliams Commerce Ltd: fifth Respondent JUDGMENT[1]The claims against the first and fifth Respondent having been settled via ACAS by a COT 3, they are treated as withdrawn.[2]No objection having been received to the Tribunal’s proposals as per Employment Judge Britton by its letter of 18th October 2017 and by the deadline of 25 October 2017, pursuant to r27 of the Employment Tribunal’s Rules of Procedure 2013 (“the Rules”) the claims against the second and fourth Respondents are dismissed.[3]Pursuant to rule 21 of the Rules no response having been presented, the claim succeeds against the third Respondent. The remedy to which the Claimant is entitled will be determined at a Remedy Hearing.