Mr A Wilson v NRS Healthcare Ltd: 2600477/2018

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Case No 2600477/2018
Mr A WilsonClaimantNRS Healthcare LtdRespondent
Employment Judge HeapMs C Wilson (instructed by Solicitor) for claimantMs J Hale (instructed by Solicitor) for respondentDate 26 April 2019

JUDGMENT

[1]The claim of age discrimination is dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant.[2]The Respondent’s application to strike out the complaints of race discrimination is refused.[3]A Deposit Order is made in the terms and for the reasons given in the attached Order.

REASONS

[1]The reasons for the above Judgment are as set out in the attached Deposit Order. _____________________________________ Employment Judge Heap Date: 21st October 2018[2]JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON ........................................................................................ ........................................................................................ FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE[3]Case No: 2600477/2018 Page 1 of 2 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr A Wilson Respondent: NRS Healthcare Limited Heard at: Nottingham On: Monday 18 February 2019 Before: Employment Judge Blackwell (sitting alone) Representation Claimant: Ms C Wilson, Solicitor Respondent: Ms J Hale, Solicitor RECONSIDERATION DECISION This Is a decision pursuant to an application made by the Respondents to reconsider a decision which was sent to the parties on 20 December 2018 in which I permitted a deposit to be accepted notwithstanding that it appeared to be one day out of time. The application was made on 24 December 2018 and was repeated in an agenda for a case management discussion which the Respondent’s solicitors forwarded to the Tribunal on 13 February 2019. Unfortunately the original application of 24 December was not referred to me and it is pure coincidence that I am dealing with the case management discussion which will be dealt with in a separate document. DECISION The application of 24 December is refused because there is no reasonable prospect of the original decision being varied or revoked. That is because all of the matters referred to by the Respondent’s solicitors in their application were before me at the time that I exercised my discretion to extend time pursuant to Rule 5 of Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals Constitution and Rules of Procedure Regulations 2013.