Mrs S Pearce v The Royal Leicestershire, Rutland and Wycliffe Society for the Blind and Ms S Hoath: 2600397/2022
JUDGMENT
[1]The claim of unfair dismissal based on the argument that employment should have been extended to comply with the requirement of two years employment pursuant to section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (“ERA”) is struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success.[2]The claim for non-compliance with section 1(2) ERA is struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success.[3]The claim that the Claimant asserted a statutory right to rest breaks during her work shifts under Regulation 12 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 is struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success.[4]The claims of direct and indirect discrimination, race discrimination are struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success.[5]The claim of direct disability discrimination is struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success. Case No: 2600397/2022[6]The claim of discrimination on the ground of religion or belief is struck out as it has not been actively pursued.[7]The remaining claims brought by the Claimant shall proceed to the final hearing.