Mr G Hayer v Concord Logistics Ltd: 2600239/2017
JUDGMENT
[1]The Claimant’s application pursuant to Rule 71 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, Schedule 1 is refused.[2]The decision to refuse the Claimant’s application for an extension of time to pay the deposits sent to the parties on 21 August therefore stand.REASONS
[1]By an application of 21 August 2017 the Claimant’s representative made an application to have the decision refusing an extension of time to pay a deposit ordered reconsidered. So far as I can understand it the application is based upon, on the very last day, the Claimant’s inability to make a payment by electronic transfer.[2]Paragraph 7 of the note accompanying the deposit order makes it plain that the deposit must be made by cheque or postal order to the address provided as part of the documentation.[3]Thus nothing has changed, the Claimant had ample time within which to make the payment. His failure or that of his representative to note the mode of payment is not grounds to support a reconsideration. There is thus no reasonable prospect of the application succeeding and it is dismissed. _____________________________ Employment Judge Blackwell Date 13 October 2017