Miss E Moore v H M Bowen T/a Duke of Wellington: 2600174/2022
JUDGMENT
Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21[1]The claim was issued in the Midlands East Employment Tribunals on 26 January 2022. The respondent has failed to present a valid response on time. An Employment Judge has decided that a determination can properly be made of the claim, or part of it, in accordance with rule 21 of the Rules of Procedure.[2]The respondent has failed to pay the claimant’s holiday pay and must pay the claimant £862.25.[3]The respondent has failed to provide the claimant with itemised pay statements, contrary to section 8 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.[4]The hearing listed on 17 June 2022 is converted to a 2 hour remedy hearing at which the Tribunal will decide what sum to award the claimant under section 12(4) of the Employment Rights Act in respect of the respondent’s failure to provide itemised pay statements. _____________________________ Employment Judge Ayre Date: 24 March 2022 Case No: 2600174/2022 10.2 Judgment - rule 61 February 2018 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Miss Emily Moore Respondent: Hannah M Bowen trading as Duke of Wellington Heard at: Nottingham On: 17 June 2022 Via CVP Before: Employment Judge Omambala QC Representation Claimant: In person Respondent: Did not attend[1]The Respondent has failed to provide the Claimant with itemised pay statements contrary to section 8 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.[2]Deductions have been made from the Claimant’s pay during the period of thirteen weeks immediately preceding 13 weeks the date of the application for reference in the sum of £862.25.[3]The Respondent is ordered to pay the Claimant the further sum of £862.25 in respect of its failure to provide itemised pay statements. Case No: 2600174/2022 10.2 Judgment - rule 61 February 2018