Miss K Fratczak v Manhattan Trading Group Ltd: 2600001/2019
JUDGMENT
Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21[1]The claim succeeds and the remedy to which the claimant is entitled will be determined at a Remedy Hearing.[2]The hearing listed on 31 May 2019 will now be to determine remedy. Employment Judge Swann _____________________________ Date: 17/5/2019 2600001/2019 Page 1 of 2 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALSEMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALSEMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant Respondent Miss K Fratczak V Manhattan Trading Group Limited Heard at: Nottingham On: 31 May 2019 Before: Employment Judge R Clark Appearances For the Claimant: In person For the Respondent: Miss L Watmough, Managing Director. REMEDY JUDGMENT UPON the Tribunal giving the Respondent permission under rule 21(3) to participate fully in the remedy hearing and the Respondent not pursuing its application for the Tribunal to reconsider the rule 21 liability judgment. AND UPON the Tribunal explaining to the parties the limitation on its powers to make orders in respect of claims of breach of contract and delivery up of goods. AND UPON the Claimant acknowledging she is required to return the work mobile telephone to the Respondent and the Respondent’s representative acknowledging it owes the claimant wages and payment for accrued but untaken holiday. AND UPON the Tribunal having considered the papers in support of the claim and quantum. By consent, the Tribunal gives judgment as follows: -[1]In respect of the claim of unauthorised deduction from wages, the Respondent shall pay to the Claimant the GROSS sum of £769.28.[2]In respect of the claim for payment for accrued but untaken annual leave, the Respondent shall pay to the Claimant the GROSS sum of £301.98.