Mr D Holliday v British Telecommunications plc: 2503457/2018
JUDGMENT
[1]The Judgment is revoked.[2]The claim form and a blank ET3 are now be sent to the respondent.[3]The remedy hearing set for 22 March 2019 is cancelled.[4]The Tribunal will list a private preliminary hearing to identify the claims and the issues arising and to make case management orders and will notify the time, date and place of that hearing under separate cover. That hearing is to be listed before anREASONS
[1]The application from the respondent makes it clear that the first it knew of these proceedings was when it received the Judgment. The claimant, having reviewed that application, consents to it.[2]The interest of justice therefore require that the Judgment be revoked and the respondent be given the opportunity to respond to the claim.[3]I am authorised by Regional Employment Judge Robertson to reconsider the Judgment under the provisions of Rule 72(3) of the 2013 Rules in the absence of Employment Judge Shepherd from this office for several days. Case Number: 2503457/2018 2 ___________________________________ EMPLOYMENT JUDGE A M BUCHANAN[1]The claimant presented a claim to the Employment Tribunal of unfair dismissal, age discrimination, disability discrimination and breach of the Working Time Regulations.[2]Notice of the claim was sent to the respondent on 25 January 2019. No response has been presented by the respondent.[3]This claim succeeds and the remedy to which the claimant is entitled will be determined at a Remedy Hearing.[4]The preliminary hearing on 22 March 2019 is converted to a 3 hour remedy hearing at the same venue.