Mr A Thurgood v George Scott Hairdressers North East Ltd: 2502718/2019
JUDGMENT
[1]The claimant’s complaint that his dismissal by the respondent was unfair contrary to Section 94 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 with reference to Section 98 of that Act is not well-founded and is dismissed.[2]The claimant’s contract claim that he was dismissed without receiving the notice of that dismissal from the respondent to which he was entitled under his contract of employment is not well-founded and is dismissed.[3]The claimant’s complaint that, contrary to Regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998, the respondent did not pay to him compensation that he was due related to his entitlement to holiday that had accrued but had not been taken by him at the termination of his employment was conceded on behalf of the respondent and, by consent, it is ordered to pay to the claimant the sum of £39.87. EMPLOYMENT JUDGE MORRIS