Mr Brian Hillock v TSUK Interiors Ltd: 2501781/2018

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS

Case No 2501781/2018

Between

Mr Brian HillockClaimant

TSUK Interiors LtdRespondent

Before

Employment Judge A M Buchanan

In person for claimant

Mrs Christine Hillock - Director for respondent

Date 17 January 2019

JUDGMENT

ON PUBLIC PRELIMINARY HEARING It is the judgment of the Tribunal that:-

[1]The name of the respondent is amended to TSUK Interiors Limited

[2]It was reasonably practicable for the claim of unfair dismissal advanced pursuant to sections 94/98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (“the 1996 Act”) to have been presented in time but it was presented out of time by reference to the provisions of section 111(2) of the 1996 Act and section 207B of the 1996 Act. Accordingly the claim of unfair dismissal is dismissed.

[3]It was reasonably practicable for the claim for a declaration of unauthorised deduction from wages in respect of unpaid holiday pay advanced pursuant to the provisions of Part II of the 1996 Act to have been presented in time but it was presented out of time by reference to the provisions of section 23(2) and section 207B of the 1996 Act. Accordingly the claim for a declaration of unauthorised deduction from wages in respect of holiday pay is dismissed. Case Number: 2501781/2018

[4]The claim of age discrimination in respect of the claimant’s dismissal on 19 March 2018 was not presented before the end of the period of three months (as extended by section 140B of the Equality Act 2010 (“the 2010 Act”)) starting with the date of the dismissal or such other period as the Tribunal thinks just and equitable as required by the provisions of section 123(1) of the 2010 Act. Accordingly the claim of age discrimination is dismissed. EMPLOYMENT JUDGE A M BUCHANAN