Mrs Rachael Gill and others v Mrs Jacqueline Tracey O’Boyle T/a Salon 32: 2501743/2017 and others
JUDGMENT
Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21 Claim Number 2501743/2017: the first claimant – Mrs Rachael Gill[1]The first claimant was dismissed by the respondent by reason of redundancy and is entitled to a redundancy payment of £1631.25p (5 x 1.5 x £217.50p gross per week) and the respondent is ordered to pay that sum to the first claimant.[2]The claim for breach of contract (notice pay) advanced by the first claimant is well-founded and the respondent is ordered to pay to the first claimant the sum of £736.94p (5x £210.24 net per week less £314.26 net earnings in the said period of 5 weeks) as damages for breach of contract.[3]The claim of unpaid wages advanced by the first claimant is dismissed on withdrawal.[4]The total sum due to the first claimant from the respondent of £2368.19 is payable forthwith.[5]All claims advanced by the first claimant under file reference 2501745/2017 (included in the claim numbered 2501744/2017 advanced by the second claimant) are dismissed on withdrawal by the first claimant. Combined Proceedings Case Numbers: 2501743/2017 2501744/2017 2501745/2017 Claim Number 2501744/2017: the second claimant - Ms Heather Lott[1]The second claimant was dismissed by the respondent by reason of redundancy and is entitled to a redundancy payment of £450.00p (5 x £90.00p gross per week) and the respondent is ordered to pay that sum to the second claimant.[2]The claim for breach of contract (notice pay) advanced by the second claimant is well-founded and the respondent is ordered to pay to the second claimant the sum of £450.00p (5x £90.00 net per week) as damages for breach of contract.[3]The respondent has made an unauthorised deduction from the wages of the second claimant and the respondent is ordered to pay £180.00p unpaid wages and £495.00 unpaid holiday pay to the second claimant.[4]The total sum due to the second claimant from the respondent of £1575.00p is payable forthwith.[5]All other claims advanced by the second claimant are dismissed on withdrawal.