Mr P Rhodes v Watergate Haulage Ltd: 2501160/2018

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Case No 2501160/2018
Mr P RhodesClaimantWatergate Haulage LimitedRespondent
Employment Judge ShepherdIn person for claimantMs Murphy for respondentDate 9 August 2018

JUDGMENT

Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21[1]The claimant presented claims to the Employment Tribunal of unfair dismissal, unauthorised deduction from wages, outstanding holiday pay and failure to provide written terms and conditions of employment.[2]Notice of the claim was sent to the respondent on 14 June 2018. No response has been presented by the respondent.[3]These claims succeed and the remedy to which the claimant is entitled will be determined at a Remedy Hearing.[4]The Hearing listed on 4 October 2018 is vacated.

REASONS

The time for presenting a response has expired and no valid response has been presented, and, on the information before the employment judge, the claim succeeds. Employment Judge Shepherd _____________________________ Date: 16 July 2018 Case Number:2501160 /2018 1 of 1 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr P Rhodes Respondent: Watergate Haulage Ltd JUDGMENT ON PRELIMINARY HEARING Heard at : Middlesbrough On: 9 August 2018 Before: Employment Judge Shepherd Appearances For the claimant: In person For the respondent: Ms Murphy JUDGMENT The judgment of the Tribunal is that:[1]The judgment dated 16 July 2018 pursuant to Rule 21 is revoked upon reconsideration.[2]This case is dismissed upon withdrawal.