Mrs M Bennett and others v Interactive Development Education Ltd (In Creditors Voluntary Liquidation): 2501111/2017
JUDGMENT
The Judgment of the Employment Tribunal is as follows:-[1]The claims in relation to a protective award in that the Respondent failed to comply with Section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations Consolidation Act 1992 are well-founded. It is appropriate to make a protective award and, given the seriousness of the Respondent’s default in observing its statutory obligations, to make that award for the maximum period of 90 days for all of the employees named on the attached schedule who were dismissed on or after 25 July 2017.[2]Christine Kirby’s claim for unpaid wages under Section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, under the claim number 2501122/2017, is well-founded and the Respondent is ordered to pay to the Claimant the sum of £356.10. Case Number: 2501111/2017 & Others[3]Samantha Rutherford’s claim for unpaid wages under Section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, under the claim number 2501119/2017, is well- founded and the Respondent is ordered to pay to the Claimant the sum of £260.80.[4]Shirley Peart’s claim for unpaid wages under Section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, under the claim number 2501149/2017, is not well-founded and is dismissed.[5]The Employment Protection (Recoupment of Jobseeker’s Allowance and Income Support) Regulations 1996 apply. The period of the proscribed element starts on 25 July 2017 and ends on 23 October 2017. EMPLOYMENT JUDGE ARULLENDRAN