Ms K E Bennet and Ms V Greaveson v Middlesbrough Alternative Provision Ltd: 2500682/2018 and 2500683/2018 Ms K E Bennet and Ms V Greaveson v Middlesbrough Alternative Provision Ltd: 2500682/2018 and 2500683/2018
REASONS
[1]The claim was presented on 28th March 2018 and served on 4th April 2018 . A response was due by 2nd May but none was received. An Employment Judge is required by rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 to decide on the available material whether a determination can be made and , if it can, obliged to issue a judgment which may determine liability and remedy.[2]I consider the above judgment appropriate because I have sufficient information in the claim form and answers provided by the claimants in response to a request made by me to enable me to find the claims proved and to determine the sums claimed are accurate .[3]The law relating to unlawful deduction of wages is in Part 2 of the Act 1996. Such sums are awarded gross of tax. The common law provides a contract of employment may be brought to an end by notice. Dismissal without such notice is termed ”wrongful”. Damages for wrongful dismissal are the net pay due during the Case Numbers 2500682/18 and 2500683/18 notice period (see Addis v The Gramophone Company) less sums earned, or benefits received, in mitigation of loss . TM Garnon