Mr MA Baxtrem v Mammoet UK Ltd: 2500646/2024
JUDGMENT
In relation to the claimants claim for unfair dismissal because of a protected disclosure. The disclosures listed below are struck out: -[1.1]In relation to waste disposal, items allegedly sold to a third party who then hired them out using the respondent’s name.[1.2]In relation to competitive tendering, in so far as it relates to allegations that the company were defrauding shareholders.[1.3]The allegation relating to the relocation of Offshore Workers to the site the claimant worked at. For the avoidance of doubt the following disclosures may proceed: -[2.1]In relation to waste disposal. Items were being disposed of that had a value and[2.2]Perfectly usable items were being disposed of and re-ordered from Tusk.[2.2]In relation to competitive tendering. Items were ordered solely from Tusk as the Procurement Team were receiving a kick back.[10.2]Judgment - rule 61 February 2018 Case No: 2500646/2024