Mr J Jackson and others v North Tees and Hartlepool NHS Foundation Trust and others: 2500640/2017 and others
JUDGMENT
[1]In each of the cases listed in the attached schedule the proceedings are dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimants. _____________________________ Employment Judge Buchanan 18 April 2018 2500640/2017 Mr James Jackson -v- North Tees and Hartlepool NHS Foundation Trust & Others 2500660/2017 Mr Thomas Alan Reeder -v- Vocare Ltd & Others 2500679/2017 Mr Adrian Anton -v- Vocare Ltd & Others 2500699/2017 Mr Mervyn Wright -v- Vocare Ltd & Others 2500700/2017 Mr Carl Pinder -v- Vocare Ltd & Others 2500701/2017 Mr Terence Watson -v- Vocare Ltd & Others 2500770/2017 Mr Paul Reed -v- Vocare Limited & Others 2500771/2017 Mr Stephen Littlefair -v- Vocare Limited & Others 2500772/2017 Mr Michael Thompson -v- Vocare Limited & Others 2500773/2017 Mr Michael Watson -v- Vocare Limited & Others 2500774/2017 Mr Philip Spence -v- Vocare Limited & Others 2500796/2018 Ms Julie Littlefair -v- North Tees and Hartlepool NHS Foundation Trust & Others 2501185/2017 Mr James Jackson -v- North Tees And Hartlepool Trust Nhs Foundation Trust University Hospital & Others[2]Case Number: 2500640/2017 and others 1 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimants Respondents Mr J Jackson and others v North Tees and Hartlepool NHS Foundation Trust and others PUBLIC PRELIMINARY HEARING Heard at: Middlesbrough On: 10 November 2017 Before: Employment Judge Shepherd Appearances: For the Claimants Mr Wright accompanied by Mr Watson: In person and on behalf of Mr M Wright, Mr C Pinder and Mr T Watson For the Respondent North Tees and Hartlepool NHS Foundation Trust (“R1”): Ms Bairstow. For the respondent Vocare Limited (“R2”): Ms Wilkinson. For the respondent North East Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust (“R4”): Mr Crammond. JUDGMENT[3]The Tribunal has no jurisdiction to hear the claims for unfair dismissal and for breach of contract brought by Mervyn Wright – 2500699/2017, Carl Pinder – 2500700/2017 and Terence Watson – 2500701/2017 and those claims are dismissed. This judgment has no affect on the claims for redundancy payments.