Mr T Worley v 808 Records Ltd: 2500325/2020
JUDGMENT
[1]The claimant’s complaint under section 23 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 is well founded.[2]The respondent is ordered to pay to the claimant £357.12, being the amount of the deduction made in contravention of section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.REASONS
[3]The claimant said in his claim form that he has not been paid for work done for the respondent and the amount owed totals £357.12.[4]The name of the respondent was amended to that shown above after the claimant confirmed that he was employed by this company.[5]The claimant has confirmed that this is the only amount he is claiming from the respondent.[6]The Respondent has failed to enter a response to the claim within the time limit prescribed by rule 16(1) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013.[7]The facts on which the claim is made are set out in the claim form and have been confirmed in correspondence and at a case management hearing. Those facts, and liability for the amount claimed, are not contested. Therefore, I have decided that a determination can properly be made of the claim on the available material without the need for a hearing and this Judgment is entered under rule 21(2) as to both liability and remedy.