Mr Darren Reay and others v Saving Energy North East Ltd: 2500208/2018 and others

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Case No 2500208/2018
(1) Mr Darren Reay (2) Mr Rik Williams (3) Mr Tony NobleClaimantSaving Energy North East LimitedRespondent
Date 18 April 2018

JUDGMENT

Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21 Claim Number 2500208/2018: the first claimant – Mr Darren Reay[1]The claim for breach of contract (notice pay and gas safe registration fee) advanced by the first claimant is well-founded and the respondent is ordered to pay to the first claimant the sum of £2524.56p (4x £586.14 net per week in respect of notice pay and £180 in respect of the gas safe registration fee) as damages for breach of contract.[2]The claim in respect of unpaid holiday pay is well-founded and the respondent is ordered to pay to the first claimant the sum of £358.44p in respect of unpaid holiday pay. This is a gross amount and the first claimant is to account to the appropriate authorities for any income tax and employee national insurance contributions due in respect of such sum on receipt by him.[3]The claim in respect of unpaid wages is well-founded and the respondent is ordered to pay to the first claimant the sum of £1724.31 gross in respect of unpaid wages (£833.33 in respect on unpaid uplift and £891.04 in respect of work in Harrogate). This is a gross amount and the first claimant is to account to the appropriate authorities for any income tax and employee national insurance contributions due in respect of such sum on receipt by him. Combined Proceedings Case Numbers: 2500208/2018[4]The total sum due to the first claimant from the respondent of £4607.31 is payable forthwith.[5]The claim of unfair dismissal is dismissed as the first claimant lacks the qualifying service of two years as required by section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 to advance such a claim. Claim Number 2500210/2018: the second claimant - Mr Rik Williams[1]The claim for breach of contract (notice pay) advanced by the second claimant is well-founded and the respondent is ordered to pay to the second claimant the sum of £1821.64p (4x £455.41 net per week) as damages for breach of contract.[2]The claim in respect of unpaid holiday pay is well-founded and the respondent is ordered to pay to the second claimant the sum of £268.84p in respect of unpaid holiday pay. This is a gross amount and the second claimant is to account to the appropriate authorities for any income tax and employee national insurance contributions due in respect of such sum on receipt by him.[3]The total sum due to the second claimant from the respondent of £2090.48p is payable forthwith.[4]The claim of unfair dismissal is dismissed as the second claimant lacks the qualifying service of two years as required by section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 to advance such a claim. Claim Number 2500211/2018: the third claimant - Mr Tony Noble[1]The claim for breach of contract (notice pay) advanced by the third claimant is well-founded and the respondent is ordered to pay to the third claimant the sum of £1821.64p (4x £455.41 net per week) as damages for breach of contract.[2]The claim in respect of unpaid holiday pay is well-founded and the respondent is ordered to pay to the third claimant the sum of £268.84p in respect of unpaid holiday pay. This is a gross amount and the third claimant is to account to the appropriate authorities for any income tax and employee national insurance contributions due in respect of such sum on receipt by him.[3]The total sum due to the third claimant from the respondent of £2090.48p is payable forthwith.[4]The claim of unfair dismissal is dismissed as the third claimant lacks the qualifying service of two years as required by section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 to advance such a claim. Combined Proceedings Case Numbers: 2500208/2018