Miss D Yousaf v Blue Ice Cream Ltd: 2500087/2020

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Case No 2500087/2020
Miss D YousafClaimantHeard remotely by video conferenceRespondent
Employment Judge AspdenMr Robinson Young for claimantMr N Singh for respondentMr Robinson-Young (instructed by counsel) for claimantMr Kerfoot (instructed by counsel) for respondentDate 16 September 2020

JUDGMENT

[1]The judgment of the Tribunal is that the Claimant was unfairly dismissed by the Respondent. Note: This has been a remote hearing. The parties did not object to the case being heard remotely. The form of remote hearing was V - video. It was not practicable to hold a face to face hearing because of the Covid19 pandemic. Employment Judge Aspden 21 August 2020 Note Reasons for the judgment having been given orally at the hearing and no request for written reasons having been made at the hearing, written reasons will not be provided unless a written request is presented by either party within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision.[2]Case Number: 2500087/2020(V) 1 of 1 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Miss D Yousaf Respondent: Blue Ice Cream Limited Heard at Newcastle by video conference On: 16 September 2020 Before: Employment Judge Aspden Appearances For the claimant: Mr Robinson-Young, counsel For the respondent: Mr Kerfoot, counsel[4]The parties having agreed terms of settlement, by consent the Tribunal orders that: a) proceedings be stayed until 16 October 2020; and ; b) unless either of the parties applies to lift the stay before that date the proceedings will be treated as dismissed on that date without further order. Note: This has been a remote hearing. The parties did not object to the case being heard remotely. The form of remote hearing was V - video. It was not practicable to hold a face to face hearing because of the Covid19 pandemic.