X v Y and Z: 2500044/2018
JUDGMENT
Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21[1]The claim succeeds against Z and the remedy to which the claimant is entitled will be determined at the Hearing already scheduled for 4th February 2019. Employment Judge P Britton Date: 29 January 2019 Case No:2500044/2018 6.2 Strike out Judgment – claim - rule 37 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: X First Respondent: Y Second Respondent: ZREASONS
[1]By a letter dated 29 January 2019 the Tribunal gave the Claimant an opportunity to make representations or to request a hearing, as to why the claim against the first Respondent only should not be struck out because• the claimant had not complied with Order 5 of the Tribunal dated 31 October 2018 and that thus it was also not being actively pursued.[2]The claimant has failed to make any representations in writing as ordered, the claim against the first Respondent only is therefore struck out.[3]The remedy hearing against the second Respondent remains listed for hearing on the 12 April 2019 with a reduced time estimate of three hours commencing at 10am or as soon thereafter on that day as the Tribunal can hear it. _____________________ Employment Judge P Britton 6 February 2019 Case No:2500044/2018 Note: This Judgment has been anonymised, pursuant to the Tribunal’s order of 31 October 2018, which prohibits identification of the claimant or the respondents. EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: AB Respondent: CD[1]By case management orders sent to the parties on 06 July 2019 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or to request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out because it has not been actively pursued.[2]The claimant has failed to make representations in writing, or has failed to make any sufficient representations, why this should not be done or to request a hearing. The claim is therefore struck out.