Miss H Benoist v John J Stirk Ltd and Broadway Pub Co: 2500025/2023
JUDGMENT
[1]The name of the first respondent is corrected to that shown in the heading above.[2]The claimant’s complaint that the first respondent made deductions from her wages in contravention of section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, is well founded. The first respondent must pay to the claimant the sum of £1498.96 (being the amount deducted from the claimant’s wages in contravention of section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 less an amount that has already been paid).[3]The claimant’s complaint that the first respondent failed to pay to her an amount owing in respect of accrued untaken annual leave due on termination is well founded. The first respondent must pay to the claimant £253.80, being the amount due to the claimant. Case No. 2500025/2023[4]The claims against the second respondent are dismissed.