Mr M Popescu v Decidebloom Ltd T/a Stoneacre: 2416736/2019
JUDGMENT
The following complaints are struck out:(a) The allegation that the claimant was treated less favourably by the requirement that he either pay the insurance excess of £500 or work ten Saturdays instead as a consequence of causing damage to one of the respondent’s vehicles in October 2019.(b) The allegation that the claimant was treated less favourably when the respondent withheld payment for overtime which the claimant worked on a Saturday in November 2019.(c) The allegation that the claimant was treated less favourably when forced to carry on driving despite being prescribed medication in December 2019.REASONS
[1]The claimant was ordered to pay a deposit of £200 in order to pursue any of the above allegations following a preliminary hearing held on 16 March 2020. The Order was sent to the claimant on 26 March 2020.[2]The claimant has failed to pay this deposit. The complaints in question are therefore struck out under rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.[3]The list of issues for determination at the final hearing is now as set out in the Annex to this judgment.[4]The hearing remains listed for 9-11 February 2021. Employment Judge Franey 4 June 2020