Miss M Reynolds v Miss K Bradbury and Adult Care – Rochdale Council: 2416022/2020
JUDGMENT
By consent, the Judgment of the Tribunal is that the claims of unfair dismissal as against the second respondent are dismissed upon withdrawal JUDGMENT The judgment of the Tribunal is that:[1]The claimant was unfairly dismissed by the respondent.[2]The claimant was not unfairly dismissed because she made one or more protected disclosures. The claim under section 103A of the Employment Rights Act 1996 does not succeed and is dismissed.[3]Applying the principles from the case of Polkey there was a 50% chance that the claimant would have been dismissed in any event had a fair procedure been followed.[4]The respondent must pay the claimant £616.24 as compensation for unfair dismissal.[5]The compensation awarded consists of a basic award of £366.24 and a compensatory award (after the Polkey deduction has been taken into account) of £250.