Mr J Qureshi-Boland v IBT Group Ltd and Studiotech (UK) Ltd: 2414842/2021
JUDGMENT
[1]The proceedings are dismissed against the first respondent (IBT Group Limited) following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant.[2]This in no way affects the claims brought against the second respondent (Studiotech (UK) Limited), who is now the only remaining respondent in this claim. 21 July 2022 Employment Judge Mark Butler[1]The claimant’s complaint that he was unfairly dismissed by the First Respondent contrary to s94 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (ERA) is well founded and is upheld but any compensatory award shall be reduced by 90% to take account of the chance that the claimant would have been dismissed had a fair process been followed in accordance with s123(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (“ERA”).[2]The claimant is not disabled and accordingly his claims of unlawful discrimination are dismissed.[3]The claimant’s complaint that he was not paid accrued holiday pay which he was entitled to on termination of his employment is not well founded and is dismissed.[4]Remedy will be determined at a future hearing.