Miss M Davies v C J A Roddy and CSG Realisations Ltd (in administration): 2413679/2023
JUDGMENT
[1]The first respondent’s response to the complaints of unfair dismissal, pregnancy or maternity discrimination, sex discrimination, sexual orientation discrimination, a claim for redundancy pay and a claim for unlawful deduction from wages are struck out under Employment Tribunal Rule 37(1)(d) because they have not been actively pursued.REASONS
[2]By a letter dated 2 August 2024, the Tribunal gave the first respondent an opportunity to make representations or to request a hearing, as to why the response should not be struck out because it has not been actively pursued.[3]The first respondent did not reply to this correspondence.[4]Under rule 37 (3) as the first respondent’s response is struck out, the effect shall be as if no response has been presented, as set out in rule 21.[5]The first respondent shall be entitled to notice of any hearings and decisions of the tribunal but shall only be entitled to participate in any hearing to the extent permitted by the judge.[6]This judgment does not affect the claimant’s claim against CSG Realisations Ltd (in administration). Case No:2413679/2023