Miss J Holland v AAO UK Services Ltd: 2412114/2023

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Case No 2412114/2023
Miss J HollandClaimantAAO UK Services LimitedRespondent
Employment Judge RossNot in attendance for claimantNot in attendance for respondentDate 29 May 2024

JUDGMENT

The complaint that the claimant was unfairly dismissed and the claimant’s claim for a redundancy payment are struck out.

REASONS

[1]The claimant complains of unfair dismissal and claims a redundancy payment.[2]Section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires a claimant to have not less than two years service to make an unfair dismissal complaint. Section 155 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires a claimant to have not less than two years service to make a claim for a redundancy payment.[3]The claimant was employed by the respondent for less than two years.[4]Therefore the claimant is not entitled to bring these claims.[5]The claimant has failed to give an acceptable reason, despite being given the opportunity to do so, why the complaint should not be struck out.[6]Accordingly, the complaint of unfair dismissal and the claim for a redundancy payment are struck out. The claimant’s other complaints are not affected by this judgment. Employment Judge Ross Date: 1 February 2024[1]The claimant’s claim for unpaid wages is well-founded and I order the respondent to pay the claimant £1,192.31 (gross).[2]The claimant’s claim for notice pay is well-founded and I order the respondent to pay the claimant one week’s gross pay of £596.15.[3]The claimant’s claim for 6.5 days accrued but untaken holidays on termination of employment is well-founded and I order the respondent to pay the claimant £774.99 (gross).[4]The Tribunal cannot award the claimant an award for Universal Credit which she was unable to obtain but awards the claimant £100 for financial charges incurred pursuant to section 24(2) Employment Rights Act 1996.[5]The total sum payable by the respondent to the claimant within 14 days of the date of this Judgment is £2,663.45 (gross).[6]The claimant’s complaints under section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 of a failure by the respondent to comply with the requirements of section 188 of the 1992 Act are well-founded. The Tribunal orders the respondent by way of protective award under section Case No. 2412114/2023 2 189(3) of the 1992 Act to pay the claimant, who was dismissed for redundancy between 14-30 September 2023 a payment equivalent to remuneration for the period of 30 days beginning on 30 September 2023. The Recoupment Regulations apply.