Ms C Hannell v Lima Networks Ltd: 2411821/2018
JUDGMENT
The complaint that the claimant was unfairly dismissed is struck out.REASONS
[2]Section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires a claimant to have not less than two years service to make an unfair dismissal complaint.[3]The claimant was employed by the respondent for less than two years.[4]Therefore the claimant is not entitled to bring such a complaint.[5]The claimant has failed to give an acceptable reason, despite being given the opportunity to do so, why the complaint should not be struck out.[6]Accordingly, the complaint of unfair dismissal is struck out. The claimant’s other complaints are not affected by this judgment and will proceed to the next hearing on 4 April 2019. Regional Employment Judge Parkin Date: 19 December 2018[1]The claimant’s claims of indirect sex discrimination are struck out on the ground that they have no reasonable prospect of success.[2]The claimant’s claims of direct sex discrimination are dismissed, having been withdrawn by the claimant. _____________________________ Employment Judge Aspden Date_____30 April 2019___________[1]The claimant’s application to strike out the response on the ground that the respondent has failed to comply with the orders of the tribunal is refused.[2]The claimant’s application to strike out the response on the ground that the response has no reasonable prospect of success is also refused.