Mr K Crickson v Meddo Ltd: 2411505/2019
JUDGMENT
[1]The claimant's claim for a statutory redundancy payment, which is not contested in the respondent’s ET3, succeeds. The respondent is ordered to pay to the claimant a redundancy payment of the uncontested amount of £4,830.[2]The claimant's claim that the respondent breached his contract by failing to pay a bonus of £100, which is not contested in the respondent’s ET3, succeeds. The respondent is ordered to pay to the claimant compensation of the uncontested of £100.[3]The claimant's claim that the respondent breached his contract by failing to reimburse expenses of £56.08, which is not contested in the respondent’s ET3, succeeds. The respondent is ordered to pay to the claimant compensation of the uncontested amount of £56.08.[4]The claimant's claim that he had outstanding and unpaid holiday pay due on the termination of his employment, which is not contested in the respondent’s ET3, succeeds. The respondent is ordered to pay to the claimant compensation in the uncontested amount of £460.[5]The claimant's claim that the respondent breached his contract by failing to pay notice pay in full on termination of his employment is well-founded and succeeds to the extent it was conceded by the respondent in its ET3. The respondent is ordered to pay to the claimant compensation of £1,104, which represents 12 days’ notice pay, such sum having been conceded by the respondent in their ET3 and expressly agreed by the claimant at hearing.[6]The claimant's claim that the respondent made unlawful deductions from his wages by failing to pay for weeks worked in hand is dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant.