Ms M Teixeira v Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Ltd: 2410963/2023 and Others

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS

Case No 2410963/2023

Between

Ms M TeixeiraClaimant

Sainsbury’s Supermarkets LtdRespondent

Before

Employment Judge Anderson

In person for claimant

Mr Carter (instructed by Counsel) for respondent

Date 18 February 2026

JUDGMENT

[1]The claims of discrimination arising from disability as provided for in s.15 Equality Act 2010 are well founded in respect of the written warning and the refusal of the appeal against the written warning. The Claimant is entitled to a declaration that she was discriminated against. All other s.15 Equality Act 2010 claims are not well founded and are dismissed.

[2]The claims of a failure to make reasonable adjustments as provided for in s.20 & 21 of the Equality Act 2010 are not well founded and are dismissed.

[3]The claims of disability related harassment as provided for in s.26 Equality Act 2010 are not well founded and are dismissed.

[4]The claims of victimisation as provided for in s.27 Equality Act 2010 are not well founded and are dismissed.

[5]The claim of automatically unfair dismissal under s.103A Employment Rights Act 1996 is not well founded and is dismissed.

[6]The claim of unfair dismissal is not well founded and is dismissed.

[7]The claim for unpaid holiday pay under the Working Time Regulations 1998 is not well founded and is dismissed.

[8]This matter will now be listed for a remedy hearing with a time estimate of 1 day. A Notice of Hearing will be sent out in due course. The parties are directed to a) no later than 21 days prior to the remedy hearing agree a short bundle of any additional documents to be placed before the remedy hearing and b) No later than 14 days prior to the remedy hearing exchange any witness statements relied upon by either side relating to remedy.