Miss S McCready and Mrs M Rushton-Scholes v Ladies Only Ltd: 2410922/2023 and 2410923/2023

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Case No 2410922/2023, 2410923/2023
Miss S McCready Mrs M Rushton-ScholesClaimantLadies Only LtdRespondent
Employment Judge LeachDate 5 March 2024

JUDGMENT

Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21 The respondent has failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge has decided that a determination can properly be made of the claim, in accordance with Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013. Miss S McCready[1]The respondent has made an authorized deduction from the claimant’s wages by way of pension contributions and is ordered to pay the claimant the sum of £465.66.[2]The claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and the respondent is ordered to pay damages to the claimant in the sum of £4001.28. 2. The claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and is entitled to a redundancy payment of £3834.56. Mrs M Rushton-Scholes[3]The claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and the respondent is ordered to pay damages to the claimant in the sum of £83.36.[4]The respondent has failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and is ordered to pay the claimant the sum of £171.93.[5]The claimant complains that the respondent failed to provide her with a pay slip. Section 8 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires an employer to provide a written pay statement and is ordered to pay 4 weeks’ pay (£83.36 x 4) to the claimant in the sum of £333.44.