Mr S Williams and Mr S McArdle v Supersafety Ltd: 2409229/2021 and 2409230/2021
JUDGMENT
Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21 The time for presenting a response having expired, and no valid response having been presented by the respondent within the prescribe time limit, It is the judgement of the Tribunal that:[1]The claims for: a) Notice pay in accordance with section 86 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 – the right to minimum notice; b) Holiday pay in accordance with Regs 15 and 16 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 ; c) Statutory redundancy pay in accordance with section 139 of the Employment Rights Act 1996; are well founded , and the Tribunal makes the following awards: Sean Williams a) The respondent failed to pay the claimant during the notice period and is ordered to pay the net sum of £676.16, and to account to HMRC for any tax and national insurance due upon the gross amount. b) The respondent failed to pay the claimant accrued annual leave on termination of employment and is ordered to pay the gross sum of £441.54, from which the respondent is to deduct and account to HMRC for the appropriate sums, if any, in respect of tax and national insurance. c) The claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and is entitled to a redundancy payment of £788.48 which the respondent is ordered to pay him. Steven Mc Ardle d) The respondent failed to pay the claimant for the notice period and is ordered to pay the gross sum of £797.58, from which the respondent is to deduct the appropriate sums, if any, in respect of tax and national insurance. e) The respondent failed to pay the claimant accrued annual leave on termination of employment and is ordered to pay the gross sum of £369.23 from which the respondent is to deduct the appropriate sums, if any, in respect of tax and national insurance. f) The claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and is entitled to a redundancy payment of £923.08 which the respondent is ordered to pay him.