Mr C Masharani v L Rowland & Company (Retail) Ltd: 2408937/2021
JUDGMENT
ON LIABILITY The agreed list of issues in this case is attached (“the List”). It is the unanimous decision of the Tribunal that:[1]The complaint of indirect disability discrimination made against the first respondent referred to in section A of the List is not well-founded and is dismissed.[2]The complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments for disability made against the first respondent set out in section B of the List is well-founded and succeeds.[1]First hearing adjourned after the commencement of evidence because one of the counsel became unwell[2]Reconvened hearing also had to adjourned due to ill health of one of the counsel before the parties attended the hearing[3]The complaints of direct age discrimination made against the first respondent under paragraph 2 of section C of the List is dismissed on withdrawal.[4]The complaint of direct age discrimination made against the first and second respondent under paragraph 3 of section C of the List is not well founded and is dismissed.[5]The complaints of direct disability discrimination made against the first respondent under paragraph 2 of section D of the List are dismissed on withdrawal.[6]The remaining complaint of direct disability discrimination made against the first and respondent set out in section D is not well-founded and is dismissed.[7]The complaints of discrimination arising from disability made against the first respondent under para 2.1 and 2.3 in section E are dismissed on withdrawal.[8]The remaining complaints in section E made against the first and second respondent are not well founded and are dismissed.[9]The complaints of harassment related to age and/or disability made against the first respondent in paragraph 1 of section F of the List are dismissed on withdrawal.[10]The remaining complaints of harassment related to age and/or disability in section F of the List are not well founded made against the first and second respondent and are dismissed. Approved by