Miss H Stalker v Norens Ltd T/a Homecrest: 2408335/2022

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Case No 2408335/2022
Miss H StalkerClaimantNorens Limited t/a HomecrestRespondent
Employment Judge Franey DateDate 15 May 2023

JUDGMENT

Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21[1]The respondent has failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge has decided that a determination can properly be made of the claim, in accordance with Rule 21 of the Rules of Procedure.[2]The claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and is entitled to a redundancy payment of £778.10 (1 week’s pay for each full year worked when the claimant was aged between 22 and 41; 1 x 2 x £389.05 = 777.98).[3]The claim in respect of holiday pay is dismissed because the claimant is unable to calculate what sum, if any, is due.