Mr M Forshaw and Mrs N Anwar v AAQUA Ltd: 2408118/2022 and 2408332/2022
JUDGMENT
Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21 Both claimants[1]The respondent has failed to present a valid response on time for the claims brought by Mr M Forshaw or Mrs N Anwar. The Employment Judge has decided that a determination can properly be made of the claim, or part of it, in accordance with rule 21 of the Rules of Procedure. Mr M Forshaw[2]The respondent has made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and is ordered to pay the claimant the gross sum of £7,083.33 (1 month’s pay for August).[3]The claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and the respondent is ordered to pay damages to the claimant in the sum of £7,083.33 (1 month’s notice).[4]The respondent has failed to pay the claimant’s accrued annual leave entitlement of 7.5 days and is ordered to pay the claimant the gross sum of £1,746.57 (gross yearly pay £84,999.96 divided by 365 days x 7.5 days).[5]The claim for a redundancy payment is struck out because the claimant has insufficient service with the respondent to bring such a claim. Mrs N Anwar[6]The respondent has made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and is ordered to pay the claimant the gross sum of £6,741 (1 month’s pay for August).[7]The claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and the respondent is ordered to pay damages to the claimant in the sum of £6,741 (1 month’s notice).[8]The respondent has failed to pay the claimant’s accrued annual leave entitlement of 11 days and is ordered to pay the claimant the gross sum of £2,438 (gross yearly pay £80,892 divided by 365 days x 11 days).