Ms B Macedo v Krystal CSG Ltd and C Thompson: 2406637/2023
JUDGMENT
[1]The claimant was treated unfavourably by the first and second respondent because of her protected characteristic of pregnancy, and her claim discrimination brought under Section 18 of the Equality Act 2010 is wellfounded and adjourned to a remedy hearing at date to be arranged when the claimant returns to England.[2]The claimant was automatically unfairly dismissed by reason of her pregnancy, and the claim brought under section 99 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 as amended is well-founded against the first respondent.[3]The claimant suffered an unlawful deduction of wages in the sum of £301.63 net. The complaint brought under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 as amended is well-founded and the first respondent is ordered to pay to the claimant unpaid wages in the sum of £301.63. The first respondent is responsible for the payment of any tax or National Insurance 6 March 2024[1]The first and second respondent are ordered to pay to the claimant the sum of £5000 for injury to feelings plus interest at 8 percent from 20 February 2023 to 13 October 2025 totalling £869.71.[2]The first and second respondent are ordered to pay to the claimant damages for loss of earnings in the sum of £1206.50 plus interest in the sum of £140.04.[3]The first and second respondent are ordered to pay to the claimant an uplift for failing to comply with the ACAS Code of Practice in the sum of 25 percent totalling ££1804.06 (25% of £7216.25).[4]The recoupment regulations apply to the loss of earning claim. The prescribed information is as follows:[1]The prescribed element to be retained by the first and second respondent pending benefit recoupment: £1207.50[2]The prescribed period: 20 February 2023 to 13 October 2025 Total award: £9021.31[4]Balance due to be paid to the claimant under this Judgment: £7813.81 20 October 2025