Ms D Atkins v EEV Management Ltd: 2406593/2022

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Case No 2406593/2022
Ms D AtkinsClaimantEEV Management LimitedRespondent
Employment Judge Dunlop DateDate 12 January 2023

JUDGMENT

Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21[1]The respondent has failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge has decided that a determination can properly be made of the claim in accordance with rule 21 of the Rules of Procedure.[2]The respondent has made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and is ordered to pay the claimant the gross sum of £486.33 (£324.22 fortnightly wage divided by 2 weeks = £162.11 per week; £162.11 x 3 weeks = £486.33) for non-payment of three weeks in hand.[3]The respondent has made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and is ordered to pay the claimant the gross sum of £194.00 (£162.11 per week divided by five days = £32.42 per day; £32.42 x 6 days = £194.53) for non-payment of 6 days in March 2022.[4]The respondent has failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and is ordered to pay the claimant the sum of £680.86 (£162.11 per week divided by 5 days = £32.42 per day; £32.42 x 21 days = £680.86).