A Alim v Ryan Speciality Corporate Services Ltd: 2406399/2024
JUDGMENT
Upon hearing from the parties present, the judgment of the Tribunal is that:[1]The complaints of unfair dismissal, unauthorised deductions from wages and age discrimination, together with the allegations of direct race/religious discrimination numbered (2), (3), (4) and (5) in the draft list of issues appended to the case management orders of Employment Judge Butler, sent to the parties on 29 April 2025, are struck out for having no reasonable prospects of success;[2]The following complaints are subject to deposit orders as set out in the attached document because they have little reasonable prospects of success:a. The complaint of indirect race/religious discrimination;b. Allegation (1) in the draft list of issues appended to the case management orders of Employment Judge Butler, sent to the parties on 29 April 2025, of a failure to provide the claimant with Continuing Professional Development;c. Allegation (9) in the draft list of issues appended to the case management orders of Employment Judge Butler, sent to the parties on 29 April 2025, of the claimant not being allowed to work from home for at least 3 days per week because he was under 35 years of age;[3]The complaint of disability discrimination is subject to an Unless Order, the terms of set out in the attached document;[4]The following complaints shall proceed to hearing:a. Harassment because of race;b. The allegations of direct race/religious discrimination numbered (6), (7) and (8) in the draft list of issues appended to the case management orders of Employment Judge Butler, sent to the parties on 29 April 2025.c. Such further complaints as identified in 2. and 3. above dependent on whether the claimant pays the deposit order(s) and/or complies with the Unless Order as appropriate. APPROVED BY: