Mr A Moiz v 1st Med Ltd: 2406394/2025
JUDGMENT
The complaint that the claimant was unfairly dismissed and the complaint that the claimant was entitled to be paid a statutory redundancy payment are struck out.REASONS
[1]The claimant complains of unfair dismissal and that he was entitled to be paid a statutory redundancy payment.[2]Section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires a claimant to have not less than two years service to make an unfair dismissal complaint.[3]Section 155 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires a claimant to payment.[4]The claimant was employed by the respondent for less than two years.[5]Therefore, the claimant is not entitled to bring a complaint of unfair dismissal and he was not entitled to be paid a statutory redundancy payment.[6]The claimant has failed to give an acceptable reason, despite being given the opportunity to do so, why the complaints should not be struck out. Case number: 2406394/2025 2[7]Accordingly, the complaints of unfair dismissal and entitlement to a complaints are not affected by this judgment. Approved by