Mrs S Mann and Others v Santangeli Ltd: 2405709/2025 and Others
JUDGMENT
[1]Mrs S Mann is awarded a total of £6,945.70 on the basis that:(1) the Claimant is entitled to a redundancy payment, and the Respondent is ordered to pay to the Claimant the sum of £4,603.62 as a redundancy payment;(2) the complaint of breach of contract in relation to notice pay is well-founded and succeeds so that, after taking account of sums received in mitigating any loss, the Respondent is ordered to pay the Claimant £1,658.32 as damages for breach of contract (this figure has been calculated using gross pay to reflect the likelihood that the Claimant will have to pay tax on it as post-employment notice pay);(3) the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages is well-founded and the Claimant's wages in the period from 1 to 8 October 2025 inclusive and the - 1 - Respondent is ordered to pay the Claimant £293.04 which is the gross sum deducted (so that the Claimant is responsible for the payment of any tax or National Insurance);(4) the Respondent made unauthorised deductions from the Claimant's wages by failing to pay the Claimant for holidays accrued but not taken on the date that the Claimant’s employment ended so that the Respondent is ordered to pay the Claimant £390.72, which is the gross sum deducted (on the basis that the Claimant is responsible for the payment of any tax or National Insurance).[2]Mrs M Horsman is awarded a total of £4,108.80 on the basis that:(1) the Claimant is entitled to a redundancy payment, and the Respondent is ordered to pay to the Claimant the sum of £2,499.99 as a redundancy payment;(2) the complaint of breach of contract in relation to notice pay is well-founded and succeeds so that, after taking account of sums received in mitigating any loss, the Respondent is ordered to pay the Claimant £1,128.16 as damages for breach of contract (this figure has been calculated using gross pay to reflect the likelihood that the Claimant will have to pay tax on it as post-employment notice pay);(3) the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages is well-founded and the Claimant's wages in the period from 1 to 11 October 2025 inclusive and the Respondent is ordered to pay the Claimant £480.65 which is the gross sum deducted (so that the Claimant is responsible for the payment of any tax or National Insurance);(4) no award is made as to holiday pay;(5) the application of the Claimant to amend her Claim to include complaints of unfair dismissal, pregnancy discrimination and as to maternity pay was not allowed.[3]Mrs R Colson is awarded a total of £14,899.74 on the basis that:(1) the Claimant is entitled to a redundancy payment, and the Respondent is ordered to pay to the Claimant the sum of £10,130.61 as a redundancy payment;(2) the complaint of breach of contract in relation to notice pay is well-founded and succeeds so that, after taking account of sums received in mitigating any loss, the Respondent is ordered to pay the Claimant £3,859.36 as damages for breach of contract (this figure has been calculated using gross pay to reflect the likelihood that the Claimant will have to pay tax on it as post-employment notice pay);(3) the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages is well-founded and the Claimant's wages in the period from 2 to 10 October 2025 inclusive and the Respondent is ordered to pay the Claimant £909.57 which is the gross sum - 2 - deducted (so that the Claimant is responsible for the payment of any tax or National Insurance);(4) no award is made as to holiday pay.[4]Miss N Sadler is awarded a total of £588.63 on the basis that:(1) the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages is well-founded and the Claimant's wages in the period from 1 to 8 October 2025 inclusive and the Respondent is ordered to pay the Claimant £588.63 which is the gross sum deducted (so that the Claimant is responsible for the payment of any tax or National Insurance;(2) no award is made for a redundancy payment;(3) no award is made for notice pay;(4) no award is made as to holiday pay. Approved by