Mrs C Stake and Others v P Kieu: 2404937/2022 and Others
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Case No 2404937/2022
Between
Mrs C Stake and OthersClaimantP KieuRespondent
Before
Employment Judge FicklinDate 10 January 2023
JUDGMENT
[1]The first claimant is Mrs Cheryl Stake. Her claim against the respondent for failure to make a redundancy payment is well-founded. She is awarded £4275 in redundancy pay.[2]Mrs Stake’s claim for breach of contract (notice pay) is well-founded. She is awarded £1900 in notice pay.[3]Mrs Stake is awarded two weeks’ gross pay (£380) under Section 38 (3)(a)-(b) of the Employment Act 2002 due to the respondent's failure to provide a statement of employment particulars.[4]Mrs Stake is awarded a total of £6555. Second Claimant[5]The second claimant is Mrs Gail Stoddard. Her claim against the respondent for failure to make a redundancy payment is well-founded. She is awarded £1311 in redundancy pay.[6]Mrs Stoddard’s claim for breach of contract (notice pay) is well-founded. She is awarded £570 in notice pay.[7]Mrs Stoddard is awarded two weeks’ gross pay (£114) under Section 38 (3)(a)- (b) of the Employment Act 2002 due to the respondent's failure to provide a statement of employment particulars.[8]Mrs Stoddard is awarded a total of £1995. Third Claimant[9]The first claimant is Mrs Paula Ball. Her claim against the respondent for failure to make a redundancy payment is well-founded. She is awarded £2736 in redundancy pay.[10]Mrs Ball’s claim for breach of contract (notice pay) is well-founded. She is awarded £1520 in notice pay.[11]Mrs Ball is awarded two weeks’ gross pay (£304) under Section 38 (3)(a)-(b) of the Employment Act 2002 due to the respondent's failure to provide a statement of employment particulars.[12]Mrs Ball is awarded a total of £4560.