Miss J Pritchard v Intrinsic FM: 2404659/2019
JUDGMENT
The complaint in respect of a Redundancy Payment is struck out.REASONS
[1]By a letter dated 30 April 2019 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations as to why the complaint in respect of a Redundancy Payment should not be struck out because the claimant had not been continuously employed by the respondent for at least two years when she was dismissed.[2]The claimant has failed to make any representations in writing. The complaint in respect of a Redundancy Payment is therefore struck out.[3]The claimant’s remaining claim remains listed for hearing on 31 July 2019. Employment Judge Sherratt 23 May 2019[1]The claimant’s complaint of failure to pay to the claimant an amount due to the claimant under regulation 14 (2) or regulation 16 (1) of the Working Time Regulations 1998 is well-founded and the respondent shall pay to the claimant the sum of £225.00 in respect of 25 hours untaken but accrued holiday (holiday pay) at the rate of £9.00 per day. This is a gross sum, and the claimant should account to HMRC for tax and national insurance (if any) due upon it.[2]The claimant’s complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages is well-founded and succeeds. The respondent unlawfully deducted from payments due the sum of £42.00 . The respondent is ordered to pay the claimant the said sum of £42.00. This is a gross sum, and the claimant shall account to HMRC for the appropriate deductions (if any) for tax and national insurance.