Mrs T Koncsag v The Venetian and others: 2404343/2016
JUDGMENT
[1]The claimant was employed by the second respondent at the effective date of termination.[2]The first and third respondent are, therefore, dismissed from the proceedings.[3]The claim will proceed against the second respondent.[4]Employment Judge Slater will consider on 19 April 2017 in chambers whether to make a judgment on the papers under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 (the parties are not to attend).[1]The respondent has made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages by failing to pay the claimant the full amount of wages due for May and June 2016 including pay for holiday taken and is ordered to pay the claimant the gross sum of £1243.90.[2]The claimant was entitled to be paid a statutory redundancy payment of £651.24.[3]The complaint of unfair dismissal is well founded and the respondent is ordered to pay to the claimant a compensatory award for unfair dismissal of £770. The Recoupment Regulations apply to this award. The grand total of the award is £770. The prescribed element is £420. The period of the prescribed element is 24 June 2016 to 19 April 2017. The excess of the grand total over the prescribed element is £350. The annex to this judgment explains the operation of the Recoupment Regulations.[4]The respondent is ordered to pay to the claimant an additional amount of £868.32 pursuant to section 38 Employment Act 2002 for failing to provide the claimant with a written statement of employment particulars.