Miss A Hitchen and others v Brookhouse Assets Ltd: 2403981/2023 and others
JUDGMENT
Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21 All Claimants[1]The respondent has failed to present a valid response on time for the claims brought by Miss Hitchen, Miss Sellars or Miss Holden. The Employment Judge has decided that a determination can properly be made of the claim, or part of it, in accordance with rule 21 of the Rules of Procedure.[2]The figures below are awarded in gross sums. The claimants should be aware that they may receive less than these amounts if the respondent accounts for statutory deductions before satisfying the awards. If the respondent pays the claimants the gross figures, then each claimant may need to satisfy any tax burdens individually from that award. Miss A Hitchen[3]The claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and the respondent is ordered to pay damages to the claimant in the sum of £4,560 (weekly pay £380 x maximum statutory notice 12 weeks = £4,560).[4]The claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and is entitled to a redundancy payment of £9,690 (17 x 1.5 week’s pay for every compete year of service when the claimant was aged 41 or older x £380 = £9,690)[5]The claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and the respondent is ordered to pay damages to the claimant in the sum of £1,254. (6 x £209 = £1,254)[6]The claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and is entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,254 (1 week’s pay for every complete year of service when the claimant was aged between 22 and 41 x 6 x weekly pay £209 =£1,254).[7]The claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and the respondent is ordered to pay damages to the claimant in the sum of £1,688.05.[8]The claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and is entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,688.05 (1 week’s pay for every complete year of service when the claimant was aged between 22 and 41 x 7 x weekly pay £ 241.15 =£1,688.05).