Mrs J Colwell v Killer Presentations Ltd: 2403739/2017
JUDGMENT
[1]The claimant’s employment did not terminate during the meeting of 15 May 2017.[2]The discussion on 15 May 2017 was held before the termination of the claimant’s employment and was with a view to terminating the employment on terms to be agreed. Nevertheless, section 111A(1) Employment Rights Act 1996 does not apply to the conversation because the tribunal considers it just for everything said during that conversation to be admissible.[3]Nothing said in the 15 May 2017 meeting is covered by “without prejudice” privilege. Employment Judge Horne 5 February 2018 SENT TO THE PARTIES ON 12 February 2018 Case No. 2403739/2017 2 FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE Note: Reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing. Written reasons will not be provided unless a party makes a request in writing within 14 days of the judgment being sent to the parties. If written reasons are provided they will be displayed on the tribunal’s website. Case No. 2403739/2017 1 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mrs J Colwell Respondent: Killer Presentations Limited HELD AT: Liverpool ON: 8 and 9 May 2018 BEFORE: Employment Judge Horne REPRESENTATION: Claimant: Respondent: Mr T Gosling, counsel Mr P Warnes, consultant[1]The claimant was unfairly dismissed in or about May 2017.[2]The parties having reached terms of settlement, the tribunal makes no order in respect of remedy.