Miss A Chimex and others (see schedule) v ASC Healthcare Ltd: 2403352/2024 and others
JUDGMENT
Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21 Upon the response form having been dismissed pursuant to rule 28 and the claim proceeding on an uncontested basis, the judgment of the Tribunal is as follows:[1]The complaint by each claimant under section 192 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 that the respondent has failed to pay a protective award is well-founded.[2]The respondent is ordered to pay the following sums to the following claimants pursuant to the protective award Judgment of 11 March 2024: Antonia Chimex £5,778.74 Tyla Oliveira £9,587.25 Tantine Nkolo Molenge £5,736.12 Edith Dahe £2,356.39 Nafeesa Kabir £6,680.26 Solange Nehuduh Ndikum £4,176.95 Zineb Outabounte £7,396.22 Angeline Matipano £6,846.96 Anne-Marie Mcdonald £9,410.84 Irene Oyewusi £8,056.70 Laura Consterdine £6,474.47[3]The claimants Ms Ibe (2403357/2024) and Ms Kelly (2403359/2024) are not covered by this Judgment as they have not yet provided details of the amount they say that they are claiming. A further Judgment can be issued for those claimants if those details are provided within 21 days. If no details are provided the claims might be dismissed as they have not been actively pursued.